lockSecurity & Standards

Decrypt0’s methodology is built on established cybersecurity frameworks — but adapted to how real Web3 systems operate.

We don’t create new standards. We interpret existing ones in environments they were never originally designed for: exchanges, hybrid custody models, smart contracts, and tokenized infrastructure.

Our goal is simple: translate technical risk into decisions operators and leadership can actually act on.


Using Traditional Frameworks in a Non-Traditional Environment

NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Findings are mapped to the five NIST CSF functions so security issues are expressed as operational risk, not isolated technical defects:

  • Identify — assets, dependencies, and exposure surfaces

  • Protect — access control, custody structure, key management

  • Detect — monitoring coverage and visibility gaps

  • Respond — incident procedures and escalation readiness

  • Recover — operational continuity and resilience planning

This mapping helps teams understand not just what is wrong, but what breaks if it fails.


NIST SP 800 Guidance

Relevant SP-800 controls inform how we assess maturity across:

  • governance and risk ownership

  • identity and privilege management

  • monitoring and logging practices

  • incident handling capability

We measure how controls function in practice, not whether documentation exists.


OWASP Application Security

For application and API environments we apply OWASP baselines, including:

  • OWASP Top 10

  • OWASP API Security Top 10

These are used as minimum hygiene standards — not proof of security — covering authentication logic, data validation, authorization boundaries, and abuse paths.


Blockchain & Smart Contract Context

Traditional frameworks rarely address blockchain-specific failure modes. Decrypt0 layers ecosystem standards on top of conventional security practice.

Contract-Level Review

We reference established classification systems such as:

  • OWASP Smart Contract risks

  • SWC Registry patterns

  • protocol-specific design assumptions

These inform both manual review and AGNI detection logic.

Chain & Protocol Considerations

Security is evaluated in context, including:

  • upgradeability and proxy behaviour

  • oracle and dependency trust models

  • EVM implementation differences

  • governance and upgrade authority

Contracts are secure only relative to their environment.


Custody & Key Management

Custody failures rarely come from cryptography — they come from process.

We assess custody as an operational system:

  • key generation and storage practices

  • separation of duties

  • withdrawal authorization controls

  • monitoring and escalation safeguards

The objective is to understand who can move funds, who could, and who should never be able to.


Exchange Security Methodology

Centralized exchanges combine financial infrastructure with software platforms, making them one of the most complex risk environments in Web3.

Attack Surface Mapping

We evaluate the full environment:

  • user-facing apps and APIs

  • internal tools and admin panels

  • automation and trading systems

  • external integrations and dependencies

Operational Risk

Most real incidents originate here. We review:

  • privilege escalation paths

  • human process weaknesses

  • operational safeguards

  • response readiness

Asset Protection

We analyze how funds actually move:

  • wallet architecture and segregation

  • withdrawal protections

  • anomaly detection coverage


Transparency & Trust Readiness

Security is ultimately judged by counterparties — exchanges, regulators, partners, and users.

Our work therefore evaluates whether a platform can convincingly demonstrate reliability, not merely claim it.

Outputs are framed in terms of:

  • transparency quality

  • operational clarity

  • trust expectations

Security becomes measurable credibility.


What This Enables

Applying recognized frameworks to real operating environments allows:

  • leadership-level risk understanding

  • alignment with regulatory expectations

  • meaningful preparation before audits or listings

  • reduced gap between passing checks and surviving incidents

Decrypt0 does not certify compliance. We prepare teams to operate responsibly within it.


👉 Next: Regulatory & MiCA Readiness

Last updated